Hospital trust fined over data breach which revealed sexuality and religion of staff

A health trust has been hit with a £185,000 fine after it posted the private details of thousands of members of staff '“ including their sexual orientation '“ on its website.

Wednesday, 4th May 2016, 11:33 am
Updated Wednesday, 4th May 2016, 1:34 pm
Blackpool Victoria Hospital

Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust inadvertently published workers’ confidential data which also included their National Insurance number, date of birth and religious beliefs in March 2014, watchdogs revealed.

The organisation failed to notice the mistake for 10 months and then took a further five months to alert affected staff, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said as it announced the penalty.

Stephen Eckersley, head of enforcement at the ICO, said:”This trust played fast and loose with the highly sensitive and private information that was entrusted to them.

“It seems they ignored their duty to put rules in place to protect staff who deliver hospital services to others.

“Any measures taken to protect this information from reaching the public domain were woefully inadequate or non-existent. The fact that the error went unnoticed for so long beggars belief.”

The breach related to spreadsheets containing confidential and sensitive personal data relating to 6,574 employees past and present - including pay scale, disabled status, ethnicity, religious belief and sexual orientation.

Information was volunteered by staff as part of the trust’s commitment to publish annual equality and diversity metrics on its website.

The ICO said the trust failed to notice that the published spreadsheets also contained hidden data that became visible by simply double-clicking the table.

During the period that the spreadsheets were publicly available, tables were accessed at least 59 times by 20 visitors, while associated data was also downloaded by “persons unknown” on several occasions, according to a penalty notice published by the watchdog.

Mr Eckersley added: “There was a need for robust measures to safeguard against this kind of disclosure. I can see no good reason for that not happening and that is why we have taken action.”